Time For A Smackdown Of The Renegade Judiciary

I've written at length about how federal courts have elevated themselves above the Constitution and routinely shred it (check my posts under the labels of 14th Amendment, Constitution, and law). Whenever given the chance, federal courts curtail the broad, presumptive power of the states while expanding the narrow, enumerated powers of the federal government. This also is the case with regard to immigration, as federal courts routinely step in to prevent states from taking modest measures to protect themselves from foreign invaders, such as terminating benefits like public schooling and welfare assistance. These benefits are entirely discretionary when it comes to American citizens, but for illegal squatters they are sacrosanct and untouchable.

In decision after decision, federal courts have held that the states have NO authority to make policy on immigration because this is the supposed province of the President and Congress -- who for their part do nothing and treasonously allow the invasion to continue, along with its associated ills of crime, disease, environmental degradation, budgetary strain, and cultural collapse.

As if by magic, all that has changed now that a President is wielding his power in an effort to stem the tide. Now ruling against the federal government and in favor of two states -- Washington and Minnesota -- a federal court has blocked President Trump's limited travel ban. Not only does this reverse generations of jurisprudence, but it completely ignores the constitutional doctrine of standing, whereby federal courts will not entertain a lawsuit unless the party bringing it can show direct harm and the possibility of redress for that harm. These states have suffered no direct harm and even admit as much, proclaiming that they are acting on behalf of individuals who might be harmed by the travel ban. In ANY other instance, the lawsuit would be dismissed on its face as improper and beyond the court's jurisdiction. How quickly that constitutional doctrine has vanished as well.

There is only one connecting thread to all this inconsistency: the establishment will say or do anything to keep the borders open and destroy the American nation. Under these dire circumstances, President Trump would do well to implement his policies and ignore the courts. President Andrew Jackson -- whose portrait graces Trump's wall -- ignored the Supreme Court when noting that Chief Justice Marshall had made his decision regarding the relocation of Indians and was free to enforce it if he could. Abraham Lincoln ignored the Supreme Court's rulings against his multiple unconstitutional actions and even signed out an arrest warrant for the Chief Justice. Both Jackson and Lincoln grace our currency, which I would gladly pay to watch Trump steal a page from their playbook.

Surely the establishment will cry bloody murder if he does something like this, but now is the time for choosing. Do we honor the courts and destroy the nation, or do we honor the President and at least try to save the nation? There is no easy way out.

UPDATE

A panel from the Ninth Circus Court of Appeals has affirmed the District Court's ruling and, consequently, confirmed that most of the federal government is at war with the nation. This isn't really news, as the federal government has been at war with the nation for quite some time. The only difference is that now one branch is led by someone who is trying to save the nation before it's too late. The resistance from the courts is unfortunate, but the resistance from many people calling themselves Americans is execrable.